Not too shabby of a way to start draft week! The Celtics and 76ers have agreed on a massive blockbuster deal that will send the No. 1 pick in the upcoming draft to Philadelphia and the No. 3 pick to Boston.
The rumor is that the 76ers will take University of Washington guard Markelle Fultz (pictured above in white), who worked out for Philadelphia on Saturday.
The Celtics are also expected to receive a protected 2018 first-round pick from the Los Angeles Lakers, or the Sacramento Kings’ first-rounder in 2019 if the 2018 pick is not conveyed.
Top players at each position for next week’s NBA draft
1. Markelle Fultz, Washington
No player in this draft has a better mix of upside and polish. The comparisons to fellow recent No. 1 overall point guards Derrick Rose, John Wall and Kyrie Irving aren’t quite perfect, though. Fultz lacks the athleticism of the first two and the singular talent of Irving’s scoring, but he appears to be an even more well-rounded prospect with more size and defensive potential. The only real question appears to be mental: Is he a natural competitor?
2. Lonzo Ball, UCLA
Ignore his father, please. Ball is the best passer to enter the NBA Draft since Ricky Rubio — if he’s not better than Rubio. And he is a proven high-volume shooter with all sorts of range. Still, questions abound on the defensive side, where he lacks quickness and instincts. And the bigger underlying issue is whether his strange shooting form will prevent him from being able to hit pull-up jumpers against NBA defenses. Nonetheless, his basketball IQ is high enough to overcome some flaws.
Fox’s trajectory is up, up, up. He’s an outstanding athlete with a great court sense. More Rajon Rondo than John Wall, he fits the pick-and-roll heavy offenses of the NBA with one issue: his jump shot. That may prevent him from being a superstar, but he’s an elite defensive prospect and natural playmaker.
4. Dennis Smith, North Carolina State
Smith is the point guard prospect who really looks the part. He has a traditional point guard build with great athleticism and no obvious holes in his game. The question mark comes with his attitude; he’s been known as headstrong for most of his high-level playing career so far.
1. Malik Monk, Kentucky
Here’s the dilemma with Monk: He may be the best scorer in the draft, but he may not be able to do anything else at a high level. Monk is a great athlete who knows how to get buckets at any turn. But his skill set might make him best fit as a high-volume bench scorer, a la Lou Williams or Jamal Crawford. How high would you draft a potential Sixth Man of the Year?
2. Donovan Mitchell, Louisville
No one benefited more from the combine. Mitchell is 6-3 but boasts a 6-10 wingspan and top-tier athleticism. He already knows how to contribute on one end — Rick Pitino can really coach defense — and showed flashes of being able to play both guard positions as a sophomore.
3. Luke Kennard, Duke
He might be the best shooter in the draft. That alone is huge. But Kennard also showed great instincts and the ability to score in many ways as a sophomore. Moreover, he’s tough, which is crucial if he’s going to develop into the type of “3-and-D” player teams value so highly.
4. Terrance Ferguson, Australia
One scout will tell you that going to Australia instead of college exposed all of Ferguson’s weaknesses: ballhandling, lack of a midrange game, IQ. Another will tell you he’s still moldable, and his combination of elite size, three-point shooting and athleticism makes him a must-have prospect.
1. Josh Jackson, Kansas
Jackson has remarkable athleticism and defensive potential. He’s also quietly a great passer and solid ballhandler with high basketball IQ. The main thing stopping him from being the No. 1 overall pick is concern about his jump shot, though he shot 48.1% on three-pointers for the final 17 games of his college career. Still, his upside is enormous; comparisons to Scottie Pippen and Kawhi Leonard even seem reasonable.
2. Jayson Tatum, Duke
There’s not much question that Tatum will develop into a solid No. 3 scoring option, at the least. That makes him the safest pick in the draft. But he has the potential to be more than that — 25 points per game seems reachable, and he could become a major matchup problem if he grows into his frame and becomes a small-ball power forward in the long term.
3. OG Anunoby, Indiana
One game into the college season — in which he shut down Jackson and Kansas — Anunoby seemed like a lock for the top 10. Then the injuries kicked in. Anunoby has as much defensive potential as any player in this class with his elite combination of size and strength. And he was showing improvement on offense before tearing a knee ligament in January.
4. Justin Jackson, North Carolina
If Jackson, 22, were a freshman with his numbers, he’d be an undoubted elite prospect. But he took a long path to being a good shooter, is rail thin for his 6-8 frame and doesn’t stand out as an athlete. For now, he looks like a potential starter but not a star.
1. Jonathan Isaac, Florida State
He’s 6-11 and moves like a guard. He’s selfless and committed to the defensive end, and he grades out well in statistical analysis. There’s little that Isaac can’t do; a favorite comparison for him is Lamar Odom. Isaac is one of the handful of prospects in this draft who seems capable of changing an entire team, but his frame and occasional disappearances make him a bust risk, too.
2. Lauri Markkanen, Arizona
Markkanen’s 7-foot frame and legitimate three-point range make him a lock to be a solid offensive contributor. The question is whether he has the potential to be a leading scorer — maybe a slightly lesser Dirk Nowitzki — or simply a role player who hits threes, like Ryan Anderson.
3. T.J. Leaf, UCLA
Like Markkanen, the focus on Leaf tends to be his value behind the perimeter. But he’s a bit more of an inside presence, with a competitive streak that makes him an underrated rebounder. His footwork is very good inside and out, and he has a nice touch from any range.
4. Jordan Bell, Oregon
Though he is best known for the rebounds he didn’t get, Bell actually is a terrific rebounding prospect. He also has elite-level quickness and may be able to guard every position, an asset in the switch-happy NBA. The question is whether he can contribute anything to an NBA offense.
1. Zach Collins, Gonzaga
Collins is a legitimate 7-footer with great athleticism, jaw-dropping per-minute stats, a penchant for big moments, great shot-blocking instincts and the ability to step out to 3-point range. He’s basically an ideal “stretch-five” for an NBA that clearly is headed in that direction.
2. John Collins, Wake Forest
Many projections list Collins as a power forward, but his future clearly should be at center. He’s shown great offensive skill in workouts, including range out to the 3-point line. That comes along with his solid athleticism and relentless work ethic. Ten years ago, he’d have been a top-10 lock.
3. Jarrett Allen, Texas
In a crowded field of centers, Allen stands out as the easiest to project a role for. He is an excellent athlete with a huge wingspan and the potential to be a great rim-protector on defense and rim-runner on offense. The questions are whether he can do much beyond that and whether he has the motor to be a great defender.
4. Harry Giles, Duke
If Giles is 100% cleared medically, he could be a lottery pick. If not, he might fall out of the first round. The former No. 1 recruit didn’t get a chance to do much at Duke thanks to injuries, but his per-minute numbers were solid, and the skill that once made him a sure-shot top pick is still there, even if the athleticism is diminished from the knee injuries.