The ease of access to the internet allows us to get our hands on vast sources of information. With this, so, is there increase in the instances of plagiarism among people of different professions, from students to career people. Despite this, many still believe that plagiarism is only frowned upon in the academic field, which is far from the truth. With the internet comes technological advances that help make our work easier. For matters plagiarism, so is there a rise in the number of online plagiarism detector. Some are free, and others are paid for, and each has its unique qualities.
Now, not many people have or trust the use of plagiarism remover, due to the myths about them that we have believed and passed over to the next person. However, we would like to demystify these beliefs to help you make an informed choice on whether or not using a paraphrasing tool will prove helpful to you:
1. It’s only useful to those in the Academic World
It is true that those in academia first embraced plagiarism detection software. However, many more industries are finding them relevant, especially in the fight against copyright infringement.
It helps industries ensure the originality of the content they receive. Publishers too have to pass submitted work through these tools before their publication.
2. It depends on the Percentage
If you’ve used one of these tools before, you have seen the output that comes after the software scans your material. It’s a percentage of the content that’s unique and that which is plagiarised.
Thus, you may use in your work, copied text that you have appropriately cited, but it gives a plagiarism error. On the other hand, copying just a few sentences, without quoting it right, is still plagiarism.
Some schools especially give students a limit on the percentage of plagiarism that they can allow. This act is what often propagates the above myth. The amount of content match that the software detects doesn’t matter much than whether you used it ethically or not.
3. They identify Plagiarism Automatically
The tools compare the text that the user submits against a database. Then, they highlight the parts that are identical or near identical to the existing content. However, many believe that if the software flags a piece of the material, that it is an instance of automatic plagiarism.
It isn’t so, as explained in the point before this. Once a passage is highlighted, you need a human to make the final judgment on whether that is plagiarism or not.
4. Plagiarism Tools are the same
Different tools have different capabilities. Your work may pass through a plagiarism check using one software, and fail in another. It all depends on the database that the tool uses to check your submission against other existing materials.
Your choice of plagiarism checker depends on your needs. Those in publishing and research companies may find iThenticate much more useful, than using Small SEO Tools for instance. As, the former, has an extensive library published and scholarly content.
5. You can easily deceive them
Well, there are always people who love to find an easy way out, by “cheating” the system. They employ tricks to bypass the methods, by altering characters, adding invisible letters using macros, and many more ways.
Some even post these “tricks” online. These attempts often require more effort than merely paraphrasing and citing your source, the right way. Besides, the creators continually try to improve the efficacy of their tools.
The first step towards avoiding plagiarism is to learn to paraphrase and cite your sources the right way. A plagiarism software helps you identify the areas that you need to pay attention to. Always check every highlighted part and determine whether it is plagiarism or not.